![]() | Foul? Plunk has more of a post game break down coming (probably when he gets over his hangov.....errr out of his Easter service)
but in the meantime, the in between time, this is killing me:
This is a little interesting isn't it? From the LA Times:
After Collison's final layup gave UCLA a 51-49 lead and after an Aggies timeout, Sloan, a 6-3 guard, drove into the lane and pulled up for the shot. It was knocked away by Shipp and afterward Sloan said he was still waiting for an official's whistle.
"I went up to take the shot," Sloan said, "and I felt maybe a couple of arms pulling me down. I just knew for sure I was going to get a foul call because, hey, everybody could see what it was. And to my surprise they didn't make the call. That kind of shocked me." Shipp said he made a clean play and Love, who was originally given credit for the block, said he was not surprised there was no whistle. "It was a tough call and at the end of games sometimes, and this sounds hypocritical after the Stanford game, but you can't call stuff at the end if there's not a lot of contact." Love was referencing UCLA's Pacific 10 Conference regular-season clinching win over Stanford that was sent to overtime when Lawrence Hill was called for a foul while blocking a last-second shot by Collison. I hate to spoil a great game with this cheap "what if" talk, but as an Aggie fan, that is a lot of contact Kevin. Not that it matters, Sloan only hits 67% from the line, plus we would have had to survive overtime, and our offense was starting to sputter, and Love and Collison were taking over. But still interesting. Thoughts? |
| |||||
| |||||||